<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do you work out beats per minute (bpm) of a heart rate when using a stroboscope?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatswagger.net/how-do-you-work-out-beats-per-minute-bpm-of-a-heart-rate-when-using-a-stroboscope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beatswagger.net/how-do-you-work-out-beats-per-minute-bpm-of-a-heart-rate-when-using-a-stroboscope/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth</title>
		<link>http://www.beatswagger.net/how-do-you-work-out-beats-per-minute-bpm-of-a-heart-rate-when-using-a-stroboscope/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Ideally, count the beats for one full minute, as this is the most accurate and is likely to pick up any skipped or missed beats. But, you can count the beats for 30 seconds and then multiply x&#39;s 2 ( this will give an estimate of a full minute= 60 secs.). At least, this is how the heart rate can be estimated with humans. I hope that this is helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, count the beats for one full minute, as this is the most accurate and is likely to pick up any skipped or missed beats. But, you can count the beats for 30 seconds and then multiply x&#39;s 2 ( this will give an estimate of a full minute= 60 secs.). At least, this is how the heart rate can be estimated with humans. I hope that this is helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

